Both the phenomenon of the Warsaw Frankists and that of the St. Petersburg Chlysty community of Ekaterina Tatarinova give testimony to the possibility of breaking out of confining religious frameworks and creating new religious initiatives outside of the established order. In a broad sense, they can be seen as part ...
(Show more)Both the phenomenon of the Warsaw Frankists and that of the St. Petersburg Chlysty community of Ekaterina Tatarinova give testimony to the possibility of breaking out of confining religious frameworks and creating new religious initiatives outside of the established order. In a broad sense, they can be seen as part of a process of personalization of faith that began in the 18th century and was manifest in various, often vehement forms in many parts of Europe.
The process of secularization, which was marked by both the distancing of social groups from the church and an increasing indifference towards issues of religious bestowal of sense, was accompanied by a simultaneous intensification of religious conservatism, which rejected the Enlightenment's criticism of religion and church.
The 18th and early 19th century was not only an age of enlightenment, but also of religious "enthusiasts" - of pietists and Herrnhuters, of methodists and "inspired congregations" of radical pietism, and of mystics.
All these movements and phenomena are symptoms of the beginning fragmentation of traditional religiousness.
Examining the everyday behavior and religious self-identifications of two non-conformist religious groups, I will focus on this process by emphasizing the relevance of social sutiations for the analysis of religiousness.
The situational approach to religiousness illuminates the fact that variability is the essence of religiousness in its significance for the structuring of social relations in diverse situational contexts.
Using the case of two non-conformist religious groups, I will exemplify the possibility of varying religious identity in different social situations as a strategy of everyday behavior.
The conversion to Catholicism and acknowledgement of Jacob Frank's messianic leadership led his Jewish adherents in Warsaw into a simultaneous affiliation with the religious commune of Frank on the one hand, with Poland's catholic community on other. This peculiar situation forced the Frankists to split their religious practice into a public profession of faith to Catholicism and a "privately" practiced Frankist creed.
The religious practice of Tatarinova's associates was characterized by a dual affiliation as well: adherents practiced "radenija," but since they had never broken with the church, could also attend Orthodox services.
I shall introduce the model of situational religiousness as a key concept for understanding the social praxis of these groups. It will be shown how the subjective sense of belonging varied in domestic life, in friendship, marriage, club and social activities, business, and religious practice.
These diverse identities were not constant and all-embracing. Rather, they were constituents of a plurality of identities and functions of situations.
(Show less)