The Bank of England began its life in 1694 with a complement of just 17 clerks. By 1815 it employed over 900 men, making the Bank, at this time, the largest white-collar employer in Britain. This paper will draw upon sets of unique sources to explore the long-run development of ...
(Show more)The Bank of England began its life in 1694 with a complement of just 17 clerks. By 1815 it employed over 900 men, making the Bank, at this time, the largest white-collar employer in Britain. This paper will draw upon sets of unique sources to explore the long-run development of the Bank’s recruitment procedures and its management of the men employed during a period in which the pool of skilled workers from which it could draw was relatively small. These sources include records of interviews and tests, the reflections of the various internal committees established to inspect work at the Bank and records of rules, regulations and the disciplining of clerks.
Labour historians have tended to neglect white collar work and, in particular, little is known about those pioneers working in the banking industry during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The first aim of this paper, therefore, is to contribute to an underdeveloped literature on Britain’s white-collar work and workers. The main purpose of the paper, however, is to explore the aptitude for the work of a group who in Michael Zakim’s words were ‘the fingers of the invisible hand’. Thus it will examine the qualities of the labour pool available to the Bank and demonstrate that the institution was often faced with a shortage of relevant skills. The paper will go on to explore the ways the Bank coped with this skill shortage, citing the imposition of regulations and periodic tightening of procedures and the introduction and maintenance of an internal labour market. It will also argue that one of the primary ways in which the institution managed skill shortages was through a process of deskilling: dividing tasks into specialised steps that required minimal training and little investment in skill acquisition.
(Show less)