As a part of my long-term project which scrutinizes the patterns of wealth, demographic trends and social change in Ottoman lands in the early modern era, my proposed paper for your network panel at ESSHC 2016 seeks to analyze the link between the possession of wealth in the Ottoman Balkans ...
(Show more)As a part of my long-term project which scrutinizes the patterns of wealth, demographic trends and social change in Ottoman lands in the early modern era, my proposed paper for your network panel at ESSHC 2016 seeks to analyze the link between the possession of wealth in the Ottoman Balkans during the period from 1700 to 1860 and the changing patterns of family formation. The project is based on nearly 3.700 probate inventories from four different regions (Vidin, Ruse, Silistra and Sofia); and the present paper utilizes the same database. This database contains the indexes of accumulated wealth per the deceased, household size, social status of partners at the marriage and book consumption used as a reliable proxy for knowledge accumulation and skill premium in recent studies of Baten, Van Zanden and De Moor. Consistent with unified growth theory (and endogenous growth theory), Baten and Van Zanden have postulated the idea that the emergence of small nuclear families combined with increased investment in human capital set in motion a “modern” process of knowledge accumulation, which was followed by the genesis of sustainable economic growth and industrial breakthrough. This approach, however, does not address (a) what role wealth inequality has in the participation of households in learning markets at the micro-level across Eurasia, (b) to what degree economic as well as non-economic factors like social prestige and practices of conspicuous consumption shape the demographic tendencies among households and stimulate the transfer of knowledge investments across generations in the so-called non-European society. In this paper focusing on the long-term linkage between demographic patterns and wealth in four Ottoman towns, I try to investigate the relationship between, on the one hand, wealth and familial attitudes toward having children and on the other hand, knowledge investments and the likely quality of child training as reflected in the number of children and book-ownership. The paper revolves around three interrelated problématiques:
1- How (much) did Ottoman households invest in human capital and to what extent did wealth and demographic structures shape knowledge investments especially book ownership and reading?
2- How did wealth influence both the number of children and the quality of child training in four cities mentioned? So is there a correlation between the number of children per household and book ownership in the Ottoman world?
3- Did literate and wealthy households necessarily develop a pattern of nuclear family size and structures? So is there a relationship between wealth inequality and nuclear family formation in Eurasia?
The answers to these questions will constitute a first step towards exploring the contours of human capital formation and demographic trends among households in Ottoman lands and help contextualize diverse socio-regional dynamics and long-term change. They will also be a first step towards bridging the gap between the study of the Ottoman experience and the global history of demographic trends as well as the related debate on the Great Divergence in the early modern era.
(Show less)