Since the end of 1980ies in Estonia life story and oral history research has been much intertwined, the current paper will seek to analyze the newest tendencies in it. Due to its national ambitions, the public practice of oral history in Estonia has favoured distanced methods, such as popular ...
(Show more)Since the end of 1980ies in Estonia life story and oral history research has been much intertwined, the current paper will seek to analyze the newest tendencies in it. Due to its national ambitions, the public practice of oral history in Estonia has favoured distanced methods, such as popular life-writing campaigns (see Kõresaar & Jõesalu 2016). In other words most of gathering since 1989 has been based on the correspondence method, and as a rule the gathering campaigns have been connected with the research and archival institutions like Estonian Cultural History Archives or Estonian National Museum. Beside that oral history method is used in the frame of research projects or local initiatives. However, in 2013 a youth NGO started to collect video interviews using oral history methods and distributing recorded material since March 2016 in the oral history portal (
https://www.kogumelugu.ee/en/). There are two new aspects in their methodological approach in Estonian context: doing oral history interviews and creating a public history digital project.
Currently the project “Kogu Me Lugu/Collect our Story” hosts over 250 stories. In their oral history portal different types of stories are represent, namely full-length interviews and short edited video clips for mainly class-room use. The aim of the project is to develop educational materials, to enable research and to raise public awareness about Estonian history during Soviet and Nazi occupations.
I will show in this paper which are the editing and selecting principles of the interviews, and in which context interviews are re-used (e.g. museum exhibitions and memorials). My aim is to show what are the methods and aims of using of oral history outside academia at the example of this project. I have followed the activities of the NGO since 2016, and interviewed people involved. I want to show the path line of this oral history portal project, which started as a small youth NGO, in 2013, but after the merge with Estonian Institute of Historical Memory, is more connected also with public memory politics, being connected also transnationally. I would like to turn attention also to relevant and marginal topics in this digital oral history portal.
Kõresaar, Ene; Jõesalu, Kirsti (2016). Post-Soviet memories and ‘memory shifts’ in Estonia. Oral History, 47, 47?58.
(Show less)